Prehistoric studies investigates the historical backdrop of humankind. In the look for material legacy, be that as it may, researchers’ desire to investigate and their vanity can transfigure their translation of finds, as a display in Hildesheim appears.

A skeleton with a crown in a bowl (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek/Museum der Archäologie Herne)

Science should assist us with understanding associations. So it is up to archeologists to research the social improvement of humankind: Where are our roots, how did our progenitors live, work, battle? How could they travel? A few parts of our history are as of now very much inquired about, yet new shocking discovers keep springing up.

Now and again, specialists were so anxious to demonstrate a hypothesis that their carelessness prompted blunders — enabling archeologists to guarantee they had discovered unicorn remains or follows supposedly left by the legendary Greek writer Homer.

Exactly how much creative ability can play a trap on you on the off chance that you need to accept unequivocally enough that an item is a genuine disclosure is obvious in one discover: a bit of iron with beautifying fittings, a circle plan and copper composite. Specialists rapidly reached the resolution: it must be a crown.

As it turned out later, it was really the fitting from a container from the sixth century AD.

Desire, vanity, business sharpness

Past the innocent oversights made by analysts previously, sometimes breathtaking antiquities were straightforwardly manufactured for monetary benefit. Radiocarbon dating strategies were not accessible to test the validness of antiquities a century prior, so it’s less demanding to see how a rumored establishment like the Louver Museum could have fallen for a phony gold crown than how present day scams have figured out how to trick such a large number of individuals.

Ausstellung Irrtümer der Archäologie

In a display titled “Counterfeit and Facts — Wrong Tracks in Archeology,” on show until May 26, 2019, the Roemer and Pelizaeus Museum in Hildesheim is returning to mainstream yet obsolete suppositions about past periods and in addition the absolute most notorious and costly instances of imitation.

Navigate our image exhibition to discover which botches the archeologists made and what the scan for a unicorn has to do with it.

A crown or a bucket? When archaeologists make mistakes - image pinit_fg_en_rect_red_28 on


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here